Art is ….

Strangely, the artist isn’t the biggest wanker of the bunch.

Controversial performance artist Jordan McKenzie, 40, has made 55 images by ejaculating over canvas and sprinkling carbon over the results to immortalise them ….

…. Father Kit Cunningham, of St Etheldredas Church in Clerkenwell, said: “All we can do is pray for the artist.”

The clergyman, based at the oldest Roman Catholic church in London, stressed: “The extraordinary thing is that someone actually thought it was art and put it on at his gallery.

“We are clearly dealing with a very mixed-up person.”

Come see everything ... artistic ejaculations

• • •


Sometimes, we respond in the moment and forego an opportunity to build something more complex than the base reaction, which may range from irony and mild amusement to shock and shuddering disgust. In this case, I went with mild amusement. And, I suppose, irony, as there seems something amiss to me about a Catholic priest—one whose livelihood depends on one of the largest creative endeavors in human history—denouncing something as unartistic.

That is, of course, the lazy route. Further consideration raises all manner of morbid questions. For answers, why not turn to the artist himself, or, at least, the Centre for Recent Drawing’s explanation of the exhibit, which opens as I write this, and runs through February 1:

During the last decade, McKenzie has produced a significant body of work that includes performance, installation, drawing and sonic art, all of which is notable for its brave and often shocking use of the body to explore taboo and push the boundaries of what is acceptable.

This latest series of drawings, collectively entitled Spent, is no less controversial. Referencing the universal themes of procreation and creativity, these works are produced using human bodily fluids: the artist ejaculates on a sheet of drawing paper and covers it with a layer of carbon dust. When dry, the excess dust is removed, leaving a black imprint of the spurted semen.

Signed and dated, the images collectively become an acknowledgment of human futility in the face of time as well as a violent record of male sexual drive. Caught and frozen as black-on-white eruptions, these simple auto-drawings plot desire, libidinal drive and sexual economies whilst powerfully evoking mortality and the will to overcome its inevitability. Each one has both an aggressive, chaotic imprint and a fragile delicacy that complement the medium, adding to the body of work by various artists that explores and articulates the notion of the artist as (pro)creator. On a more humorous level, they also subvert this, becoming an ironic take on the machismo of action painting by reframing it in a hyper-sexual manner.

On the upside, I suppose that’s more comprehensible than the guy walking ’round Britain with a rock.

6 thoughts on “Art is ….

  1. This exhibit would have a lot more impact if he had juxtaposed his creations with the inspiration for each. This is one exhibit where it may be better to see the muse…

  2. What strikes me about it is the comparative aspect of each “drawing”. Check out the one on the far left, third up from the bottom. Looks frenzied, chaotic, gasping. And then down and to the right, sort of a blob there. Is the difference one of a horny summer’s day versus a Sunday morning hangover? Or is it something more like a Posh Spice fantasy versus an old picture of Minnie Driver?

    Which raises an interesting (sort of) issue: What if the inspiration is some sort of oddball kink? Life-threatening obesity, for instance? Or dog-on-woman? Elderly men in diapers? How much of the story do we want to know?

  3. For fuck’s sake.

    This is what I get for reading your blog drunk.

    Now I am wondering if the canvas’ were on a wall in front of him or on the floor… was there any attempt made to stay within the boundaries of the canvas, or are these “detail” shots.

    Jackoffson Pollack

  4. No, Ray, it’s what we all get. You taking the day off, or is there an office hangover in there?

    I think some of them, at least, are detail shots. But there are those couple in the second row up that look like there wasn’t much to spend.

  5. the vast majorities of images on this earth are produced to create this effect
    rather splendid to see the other end of it -the result
    on paper
    art helps to catch the moment d
    doessn’t it?

  6. Art has almost lost all importance due to wankers like this making art that proves people right that think artists are a bunch of wankers.
    what an arrogant person to imagine himself so interesting that his pathetic spunk stains would be of interest. I guess the next stage in his career would be to wipe his name on the wall in his own shit or perhaps stick a paintbrush up his arse. etc etc etc –

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s